Analysts and commentators see her public disavowal of Nigerian identity and her critical remarks about Nigeria as part of a broader strategy to strengthen her appeal within the British conservative base.

By downplaying her Nigerian roots and emphasizing her British identity, she aims to affirm her loyalty and assimilation to the UK. Some interpret this as essential for political credibility and advancement in her party.

However, this stance has been met with criticism in Nigeria’s many commentators argue that her approach treats her heritage as a liability rather than an asset. Critics contend that authentic leaders can embrace their full identity and gain trust and political capital from both home and diaspora communities.

Some view Badenoch’s approach as aligning with colonial and neocolonial narratives that negatively stereotype Nigeria, which risks alienating Nigerian communities and reinforcing internalized racism in the diaspora.

It is suggested that this political posture is designed to prove her full loyalty and assimilation into UK conservatism, even if it means publicly disparaging her country of origin.

Kemi’s discrediting of her Nigerian origin functions as a political maneuver to fit within certain British political dynamics. More so, prioritizing perceived Britishness over her African heritage in the public and political sphere will improve her chances with the voters.

This strategy is contentious. It is seen by many as damaging to the relationship between the diaspora and Nigeria, as well as to wider perceptions of multicultural leadership in the UK.