Committees in both the Senate and House of Representatives are deeply examining the revenue forecasts, allocations and spending estimates. This will ensure fiscal prudence and alignment with national priorities.

Civil society groups and analysts have flagged the 2026 budget for potential weaknesses in transparency and credible financing. Previous overlapping implementation of multiple prior budgets and structural fiscal gaps have been cited. Critics warn that running multiple budgets at once can weaken oversight, delay projects and risk misallocation of public resources.

Economists and legislators have expressed concerns about delayed budget timelines. The executive sometimes misses legal deadlines on Medium-Term Expenditure Frameworks and performance reports, which complicates timely review and implementation.

These delays can undermine the credibility of the budget process and fiscal planning.

Beyond technical scrutiny, some opposition parties and observers argue the budget reflects skepticism about policy direction, transparency and the government’s fiscal choices.

They contend that without clear revenue plans and accountability, heavy borrowing and deficits could exacerbate economic challenges rather than resolve them.

The 2026 Appropriation Bill is being scrutinized because it is the central legal instrument for government finance. Its passage or amendment has wide-ranging implications for Nigeria’s economy, public services, debt trajectory and fiscal governance. Lawmakers, watchdog groups, economists and civil society all have a stake in ensuring the budget is realistic, transparent and aligned with national development goals.